|
|
| Author |
Message |
RemoteControl
Joined: 09 Aug 2005 Posts: 157 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Selena wrote: | What is the law of non-detachment (or is it non-attachment perhaps?) and why is it when we get so very attached to a goal it does not manifest?
|
Because attachment is a declaration that you DO NOT have. If you already have what you want, in reality, will you be pondering if you have it or not? Would you be anticipating or thinking about having it, if you already have it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Powerful Manifestation Service
Released to the Public!
Manifest your Intentions & Desires effortlessly.
Let a real Master
Manifest your goals for anything.
Check out
http://manifestation-master.com
|
Selena
Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 30
|
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| RemoteControl wrote: | | Would you be anticipating or thinking about having it, if you already have it? |
NO, indeed I would not. Interesting, I never thought about it that way! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LittleLightAngel
Joined: 21 Jan 2006 Posts: 17 Location: Quaint Island in the astral planes
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 7:57 am Post subject: Hmmm... |
|
|
My theory is that if you do not let it go you are not showing faith.
You end up closing off the area where you want your goal to manifest
with fear and desire energy.
In essence you attract things to that fear and desire energy.
Like attracts like, and it doesn't work right if you don't let go.
If you let go you leave that part of you open to recieve the manidfesting.
I think it is alot like reliquishing control.
If you are with fear and desire it is like a control issue.
If you are free and flowing you attract things openly becuase energy is very scary when it is filled with that fearful control thing.
I shy away from controlfreaks because they are in essence acting like voids instead of stars.
Isn't that aneat way to put it? it's not mine.
I just heard it someone, to act like a star not a void.
Anyways. Light energy will shy away from you when you are in that state.
So I'm for non-attachment.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|