Kilik
Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 84
|
 Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 12:58 am Post subject: Re-Dating the Sphinx of Egypt |
 |
|
Re-Dating the Sphinx of Egypt
Video about it a bit
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hpk9ez__rHo&search=sphinx
Video on an Archaeology cover-up
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5644481843574621580&q=atlantis
In the 1990s the evidence of water erosion determined the Sphinx to be built in 10,500 BC, as opposed to the previously held 2500 BC dating for the Sphinx. Only water, and nothing else, can cause the deep, smooth, grooved channels on it according to geology. It couldn't have rained on the sphinx enough unless it was 10,000 years old when the Giza platea wasn't a desert like it is now.
Redating the sphinx-
http://members.aol.com/davidpb4/sphinx1.html
I noticed this site because of the first part, talking about the Re-dating of the Sphinx, but there's a lot of other suff on there too it looks like
http://www.violations.org.uk/index.htm
| Quote: |
On 23rd October 1991, Schoch presented his material to the Geological Society of America, where it was grudgingly accepted rather than embraced
The American Association for the Advancement of Science scheduled a session to debate the issue at its annual general meeting in Chicago on 7th February 1992. Lehner attended along with geologist K. Lal Gauri of the University of Louisville, who had also studied the Sphinx for many years. West also attended and presented his arguments. (17) |
| Quote: |
Once again, the water erosion findings were endorsed even though Egyptologists themselves could not bring themselves to accept the implications of this endorsement.
The AAAS meeting broke up in words that, according to the New York Times "skated on the icy edge of scientific politeness
A writer for the AAAS magazine Science wrote that Schoch "hadn't convinced many archaeologists or geologists" of his findings.[26] In fact, Schoch had received offers of support from geologists after the October and February meetings. Even some archaeologists accepted his geological findings without conceding the conclusion to which they pointed"
|
also-
http://www.robertschoch.net/
and-
http://www.jawest.net/ |
|
FAQ
Refer A Friend
Search
Usergroups
Register
Subscription
Transactions
Log in to check your private messages
